Stigmatizing and Ableist Language: Alternatives and Best Practices
- Jenn Jones
- Jul 24, 2024
- 3 min read
Updated: Oct 16
Language shapes how we understand one another and how we express respect, compassion, and care. The words we choose can either reinforce stigma or create space for dignity and belonging. This is especially important when we are talking about mental health, substance use, disability, and neurodivergence.
This guide offers alternatives to commonly used stigmatizing or ableist terms and highlights ways to use language that honors people’s full humanity and lived experiences.

Why Language Matters
Language holds power. Stigmatizing words can cause harm by reinforcing negative assumptions and making people feel unseen or devalued. Choosing language that is accurate, compassionate, and person-centered supports inclusion and respect for the full range of human experience.
The following examples include common terms that may perpetuate stigma, along with alternatives that foster connection and understanding.
Common Terms and Inclusive Alternatives
“Crazy”
This word is often used to describe ideas, behaviors, or emotions, but it can unintentionally reinforce stereotypes about mental health conditions, neurodivergence, or distress. Instead, choose words that more clearly describe what you mean.
Instead of “Crazy Idea,” use:
Unconventional
Innovative
Radical
Out of the box
Wild
Instead of “Crazy Behavior,” use:
Unusual
Unpredictable
Unexpected
Wild
Instead of “Crazy Experience,” use:
Intense
Extreme
Extraordinary
Overwhelming
Wild
Instead of “Crazy Situation,” use:
Surprising
Extraordinary
Astonishing
Unbelievable
Wild
Instead of “Crazy Person,” use:
Person with unusual behavior
Person experiencing strong emotions
Individual with a unique perspective
Person exhibiting unpredictable actions
Mental Health and Neurodivergence
Instead of “Mentally Ill,” use:
Person with a mental health condition
Person experiencing mental health challenges
Individual living with a mental health diagnosis
Neurodivergent person (if they identify that way)
Instead of “Suffering from [condition],” use:
Living with [condition]
Managing [condition]
Experiencing [condition]
Navigating [condition]
Instead of “Self-harm / Self-mutilation,” use:
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)
Self-injury
Person who engages in self-injury
Instead of “High-functioning / Low-functioning,” use:
Describe specific support needs (for example, “requires support with communication”)
Neurodivergent person
Autistic person or person on the autism spectrum (depending on preference)
Disability
Instead of “Handicapped / Crippled,” use:
Person with a disability
Disabled person (if they prefer identity-first language)
Instead of “Special Needs,” use:
Person with a disability
Person with additional needs
Individual with support needs
Disabled person (if they prefer identity-first language)
Instead of “Wheelchair bound” use:
Wheelchair user
Person who uses a mobility aid
Disability and neurodivergence are natural parts of human diversity. Using affirming language recognizes that the problem is not with the person but with the barriers and biases created by the world around them.
Substance Use
Instead of “Substance Abuse / Substance Abuser,” use:
Substance use
Person who uses drugs
Person with a substance use disorder
Instead of “Addict / Junkie,” use:
Person with a substance use disorder
Person with a complex or chaotic relationship with substances
Person who uses drugs
Instead of “Alcoholic,” use:
Person with alcohol use disorder
Person with a complex or chaotic relationship with alcohol
Instead of “Clean,” use:
For toxicology results:
Tested negative
When referring to an individual:
In recovery
Abstinent from substances
Not drinking or using substances
Not currently or actively using substances
Instead of “Dirty,” use:
For toxicology results:
Tested positive
When referring to an individual:
Currently using [name of substance]
Currently drinking or using substances
Instead of “Non-compliant / Resistant / Unmotivated / Non-adherent,” use:
Not participating or not in agreement with the treatment plan
Opted not to
Has not begun
Feels ambivalent about change
Instead of “Former Addict / Reformed Addict,” use:
Person in recovery
Person no longer using substances
Instead of “Clean and Sober,” use:
In recovery
Abstinent from substances
Instead of “Lapse / Relapse / Slip,” use:
Experienced a recurrence of use
Resumed or returned to use
The Importance of Person-First and Identity-First Language
Using person-first language such as “person with a disability” or “person with a mental health condition” emphasizes that someone is a person before any diagnosis or experience. Some people and communities prefer identity-first language such as “disabled person,” “autistic person,” or “mad person,” which expresses pride, community, and identity.
There is no single correct choice for everyone. The most respectful practice is to listen to how individuals describe themselves and follow their lead. Language evolves through lived experience and community use, not by outside labels.
Moving Toward a Culture of Respect and Belonging
Being intentional with language is not about being perfect. It is about striving for understanding and care. When we move away from stigmatizing or ableist language, we open the door to more compassionate and honest conversations.
By speaking with respect and curiosity, we help build a world where disabled, neurodivergent, and mad folks, as well as those navigating mental health challenges or substance use, can be met with dignity and belonging.
Inclusive language helps us remember that every person’s experience matters, and that connection and understanding begin with the words we choose.


